Am Mittwoch, 14. September 2011, 17:46:31 schrieb Burkhard L?ck: > Am Mittwoch, 14. September 2011, 17:20:57 schrieb Anne Wilson: > > On Sunday 11 Sep 2011 Burkhard L?ck wrote: > > > Am Sonntag, 11. September 2011, 16:30:15 schrieb Anne Wilson: > > > > Eike, Burkhard - I would like to add this to UserBase, linked > > > > from > > > > http://userbase.kde.org/KGpg and from > > > > http://userbase.kde.org/KMail/gpg - is this OK? > > > > > > Sure. > > > > > > And from my pov there is no need to ask in such a case, because this > > > is > > > already in the kgpg docbook and because every text send to this list > > > for inclusion in the doc system will be GFDL 1.2. > > > > > > Sharing as much information as possible is good to serve the > > > different > > > preferences (online/offline etc) of our users. > > > > Thanks. I've written that up, using most of it verbatim from this > > thread, but adding a little more detail about the other facilities on > > the Key Properties dialog. > > Let's ask Eike about that, cc'ing him. > > > One thing that does puzzle me, though, is the "Disable > > Key" checkbox. Since this is clearly not intended to be revocation, what > > exactly is the intention? I've never dared try it, in case I couldn't > > revert :-)
Revocation is: -about private keys only -can be exported (i.e. can be made world visible) -can not be reverted Disabling key is: -about any key (even foreign ones) -can not be exported (i.e. affects only your local keyring) -can be reverted Greetings, Eike -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-doc-english/attachments/20110914/108ba338/attachment.sig>