???????? Thu, 05 Jan 2012 20:47:37 +0200, Jack <ostroffjh at sbcglobal.net>:
> On 2012.01.05 13:33, Yuri Chornoivan wrote: >> Hi! >> Current conversion system of d.k.o treats GUI elements in docbook as >> the plain text. This is strict traditional approach. On the other hand >> HTML conversion CSS has extansive system of coloring (enhancing) >> formatting. >> So, I just need a quick review. >> What do you think about GUI elements representation in the following >> files (~400 KB each, plain text)? >> 1. http://docs.kde.org/development/en/kdepim/kleopatra/kleopatra.pdf >> 2. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/55247264/index.docbook_tmp.pdf >> Thanks in advance for your answers. > > Yuri, > > I'm not exactly sure what you're asking. I do like the highlighting of > the elements in index.docbook_tmp.pdf, but I wonder if some readers > might find it too visually disruptive. I suppose it could depend if one > wanted to just read a section of the book, or if one were just looking > for specific information. I am just asking what of these two flavors can be more appealing for KDE users? > Also - both of the files attached were PDF. What did you mean by saying > "plain text"? I mean unformatted text without even quotation marks (cf. GUI elements on page 1 of both documents). There are several ways to change this: 1. Do nothing. 2. Add some quotation. 3. Use colors similar to those in HTML handbook. What kind of handling will be the best? Yuri
