> On Dez. 3, 2016, 7:59 nachm., Andrius Štikonas wrote:
> > Looks good! Just one last questions. Do you think we still need 
> > 
> >                                             <para>LVM Volume Group is a 
> > collection of LVM physical volumes that can be partitioned into
> >                                             logical partitions. It might be 
> > used to create file systems spanning over multiple devices or
> >                                             to split encrypted LUKS volume 
> > into smaller partitions.</para>
> >                         
> > in referencemanual.docbook? It partially dublicates LVM in glosarry 
> > although it might be fine to leave it here too...

it won't harm to leave it here


- Burkhard


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129597/#review101250
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dez. 3, 2016, 7:52 nachm., Burkhard Lück wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129597/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dez. 3, 2016, 7:52 nachm.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Documentation and Andrius Štikonas.
> 
> 
> Repository: partitionmanager
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> bump fate + release info
> proofread/update
> remove unused entities
> remove appendix.docbook, > 50 % of the links are dead + our target are users 
> installing distro packages
> screenshots needs to be updated later
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   doc/appendix.docbook 5882aa3 
>   doc/faq.docbook 625b2fc 
>   doc/glossary.docbook 7637d3e 
>   doc/index.docbook 79d7af6 
>   doc/introduction.docbook a0361b1 
>   doc/referencemanual.docbook f427d7c 
>   doc/usermanual.docbook ba93988 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129597/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> checkXML5 index.docbook
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Burkhard Lück
> 
>

Reply via email to