> On Dic. 3, 2016, 10:19 p.m., Daniel Vrátil wrote: > > Looks good to me > > Burkhard Lück wrote: > What about my question: > "There is not much content in this docbook and parts of these options are > already in the kmail handbook. > Maybe we should move everything into the kmail/kontact docbooks are and > delete this docbook?"
The changes themselves look good. IMHO (and waiting on developers), the options for specific programs should be documented in the respective documentation, and then there would probably be no need for this manual (even if it was something left, it could go into the main kontact manual). - Luigi ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129561/#review101254 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Nov. 26, 2016, 2:13 p.m., Burkhard Lück wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129561/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Nov. 26, 2016, 2:13 p.m.) > > > Review request for Documentation, KDEPIM and Allen Winter. > > > Repository: kontact > > > Description > ------- > > remove kappname + packages, no longer used > bump date + releaseinfo > remove "Outlook compatible invitation reply comments", I could not find it in > the code > remove empty chapter Common Problems > remove appendix > > There is not much content in this docbook and parts of these options are > already in the kmail handbook. > Maybe we should move everything into the kmail/kontact docbooks are and > delete this docbook? > Any comments? > > > Diffs > ----- > > doc/kontact-admin/index.docbook dd21a2c > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/129561/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > passes checkXML5 > > > Thanks, > > Burkhard Lück > >
