On Thursday 20 September 2012 22:02:03 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > ed71a84ca2178 is arguably broken. > > yes. a rather suboptimal replacement. before you ask, search the core-devel > archive shortly before the time the new kprocess was added.
I can't do *everything* in the KDE Frameworks 5 effort. Both QProcess and KProcess are mostly your code, aren't they? How about you fix QProcess then, if you consider it suboptimal? -- David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr Working on KDE, in particular KDE Frameworks 5 _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
