On Friday 22 February 2013, Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Friday 08 February 2013 22:36:22 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > Is it only me who would prefer CamelCase to alllowercase names ? > > find_package(KConfig NO_MODULE) > > Probably makes sense yes, AFAIK the Qt5 modules are camel cased too, right? > > Also I'm wondering if that'd make sense to namespace them somehow, is > something like KF5::KConfig possible? Is it something we want in the first > place?
What is already possible, you can find the KF5 libraries as components of KF5: find_package(KF5 REQUIRED COMPONENTS CMake Compiler InstallDir kcoreaddons kconfig kauth) and this is where I noticed that CamelCasing would look much nicer. Alex _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel