On 2013-08-23, Ivan Čukić <ivan.cu...@kde.org> wrote: >> oh. and I think it also looks a bit like your d-ptr gets in the way when >> you need a d-ptr hierachy. > > As I said, this is for non-inherited privates.
That alone is - I think - a reason to not have it. The few cases where I have needed d-ptr hierachies, I didn't know about it in advance but was happy than I could extend my classes without having to use a different smartpointer (with possibly a different size). We shouldn't make our tools so convenient that they end up being in our way. /Sune _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
