On Tuesday 24 September 2013, Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Sep 24, 2013 7:33 AM, "Alexander Neundorf" <neund...@kde.org> wrote: > > On Monday 23 September 2013, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > > > On Monday, September 23, 2013 00:27:21 Cornelius Schumacher wrote: > > > > On Thursday 19 September 2013 Sebastian Kügler wrote: > > > > > http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Overview > > > > > > > > I have put the data on Inqlude (see http://inqlude.org/edge.html). > > > > > > Thanks. One issue though, we're duplicating incomplete information that > > is > > > > in flux. (For example, I know of at least one framework that has been > > > added to tier2 (I think) since last week. The information will need > > > constant updating for a few more months. Having it in to places doesn't > > > make that easier. > > > > > > Can I update the info on inqlude.org somehow, so we can ditch the wiki > > > version? > > > > > > > It would be nice, if we could improve the presentation of the > > different > > > > > libraries along with the code. The goal of Inqlude is to make them > > easily > > > > > accessible not only to us, but also to Qt developers who don't > > > > necessarily know anything about KDE or might have (more or less > > founded) > > > > > objections against using KDE libraries. To reach this we'll need to > > > > present KF5 in a bit more independent way, and make sure that each > > > > library can stand on its own. > > > > > > Technically, this is the current focus. We're splitting kdelibs. > > > > > > As to communication, it probably needs a bit of boilerplate. (Which the > > > bits I wrote don't contain purposefully.) Otherwise, you're right, we > > need > > > > to work on the presentation side here. > > > > IMO, if projects.kde.org would have the wiki enabled, the project pages > > there > > > could be an easy way to have simple homepages for all the frameworks: > > https://projects.kde.org/projects/kdesupport/attica > > Due to maintenance and performance concerns, sysadmin would like to move > away from Chiliproject.
Oh, really ? What alternatives are you looking at ? Personally I like redmine/chili a lot. > Enabling the wiki would complicate this when a > replacement is found. > > It would also create competition with the main wikis. I don't think so. As Cornelius put it "To reach this we'll need to present KF5 in a bit more independent way, and make sure that each library can stand on its own." IMO a kind of separate home page for each library is part of that. Alex _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel