-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113197/#review41682
-----------------------------------------------------------


Looks good indeed.

Maybe an idea for an improvement: What about having the internal methods use a 
QScopedPointer on the dialog? It'd avoid the delete before the return, and if 
someone modifies the file later on adding more such returns it reduces the risk 
of missing one such delete.

Since those dialogs are exec'd anyway that should do the trick.

- Kevin Ottens


On Oct. 11, 2013, 8:56 a.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113197/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 11, 2013, 8:56 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks.
> 
> 
> Repository: kdelibs
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Factorize code between regular and *WId functions, reducing the file size by 
> 12%.
> 
> This patch adds another level of indirection. For example the sorry() 
> function is changed from:
> 
>     void sorry(QWidget *parent, ...args)
>     {
>         QDialog *dialog = new QDialog(parent);
>         /* fill dialog */
>     }
> 
> to:
> 
>     static void sorryInternal(QDialog *dialog, ...args)
>     {
>         /* fill dialog */
>     }
> 
>     void sorry(QWidget *parent, ...args)
>     {
>         sorryInternal(new QDialog(parent), ...args);
>     }
> 
> This makes it possible to turn the sorryWId() function into a forward 
> function rather than a slightly-different copy of the original sorry() 
> function:
> 
>     void sorryWId(WId parent_id, ...args)
>     {
>         sorryInternal(createWIdDialog(parent_id), ...args);
>     }
> 
> createWIdDialog() is a helper function to create a dialog which is a child of 
> a window belonging to another process.
> 
> Note: I kept most of the code to the place where it originally was in the 
> file. This keeps the diff small, but readability would be improved by 
> grouping together similar functions. Let me know if you think it is worth 
> doing so.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   tier1/kwidgetsaddons/src/kmessagebox.cpp 0cfa491 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113197/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Builds, kmessageboxwidtest.cpp runs correctly. No other tests are available 
> though.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Aurélien Gâteau
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Reply via email to