On Saturday 28 December 2013 11:39:50 David Faure wrote: > On Saturday 21 December 2013 12:42:04 Kevin Ottens wrote: > > Hello people, > > > > I see that new tasks appeared in the wiki, that's great, they were clearly > > missing. That said, they were all earmarked for the tech preview, so I > > took > > the liberty to move most of them to the list about the final release. We > > should get the tech preview out of the door ASAP now. It won't be perfect, > > that's fine and to be expected. What we need for it is the mechanisms in > > place to roll out versions and collect feedback and make sure the code is > > stable. > > > > As a matter of fact, I didn't move the "Ensure all the necessary files are > > in place..." task only because it was already started. But really it's > > something to do post-tech preview, so I'd welcome it put on the side for > > now and considered for the final. It's OK if we don't have README files > > everywhere for the tech preview. > > > > Please let's not disperse and push toward the tech preview which is almost > > there. The (badly needed) polishing is for the months after that tech > > preview. > > Many people are surprised by the lack of camelcase forwarding headers in the > current frameworks (unless depending on kde4support). Shouldn't we have > that in the tech preview? Otherwise people can't even use the tech preview > for anything, especially in the case of existing code, leading to commits > like "change all camelcase includes to lowercase includes" (as happened > recently in kate).
Well, they could keep the dependency on kde4support just for those headers. But I see what you mean... OK, let's put it back in, but it'll need a strong push from everyone otherwise we'll get the TP1 slipping even more which I really don't like. > This seems to me like a pre-requisite for any kind of release -- and > especially a final release for KArchive and ThreadWeaver. Well, let's not fool ourselves. They're not final releases. We'll have new iterations for those until 5.0 is released. Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel