Moin moin I will update the installation in around 8 hours
mfg Tobias On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 21:52, Christoph Cullmann <christ...@cullmann.io> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 2021-04-05 21:40, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > > On Monday, 5 April 2021 19:20:08 CEST Ben Cooksley wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 3:33 AM Christoph Cullmann > >> <christ...@cullmann.io> > >> > I reverted my test commit to see if we have still some unpatched 5.15 > >> > with a broken QJSEngine around again. > >> > > >> > Still, I think it would be great if one could have some patched version > >> > in the CI. > >> > > >> > Could one update there the Qt installation to the latest available patch > >> > release? > > > > It would be really useful if you specified **what** version; if > > ktexteditor > > requires Qt 5.15.2, then please set the minimum Qt version to 5.15.2. > > Do not > > allow 5.15.0 and then complain that it triggers crashes. Alternately, > > use > > QEXPECT_FAIL if you have a beef with specific Qt versions. > > is that allowed for Frameworks? > Naturally that would be preferable. > > I just wanted to test with my commit if the CI stuff has fresh enough > stuff > that has no broke QJSEngine. That failed ;=) But if you update as said > below, > that is nice. > > I would love to raise the version to minimal 5.15.2 given that 5.15 > below that path > has a QJSEngine that randomly crashes during GC, for everything. > > I am still amazed that not more stuff fails there, given our javascripts > are trivial, > perhaps we are just unlucky to have unit tests with JS stuff. > > > All that said, yes, we can update the CI builders to 5.15.2, which is > > what > > most folk on FreeBSD would be using now anyway. > > That would be great! > > Greetings > Christoph > > -- > Ignorance is bliss... > https://cullmann.io | https://kate-editor.org