Hi,
On Sunday, January 4th, 2026 at 09:36, Ben Cooksley <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 4, 2026 at 12:26 PM Albert Astals Cid <[email protected]> wrote: > > > El dissabte, 3 de gener del 2026, a les 16:36:47 (Hora estàndard d’Europa > > central), Nicolas Fella va escriure: > > > Hi, > > > > > > on Bugzilla some of our frameworks have individual people as the default > > > assignee. This doesn't really match the reality of how KDE Frameworks > > > are developed since usually there's no single person responsible for a > > > given framework. It might give a false impression that this person is > > > going to take care of the bug. Furthermore, some of the assignees > > > haven't been active in KDE for as long as I remember. > > > > > > A lot of Frameworks have "[email protected]" as default > > > assignee. I propose that we use that for the other frameworks as well > > > (unless there's a better alternative). We also might consider creating a > > > kde-frameworks-bugs-null or similar to avoid the historic connotation > > > with kdelibs. > > > > > > > > > > I would prefer if we could get one email per component, i want to subscribe > > to > > karchive but not many others. > > > Doable but takes a bit of work, as a Bugzilla user account has to be created > for each one (can be done administratively) and we have to provision the > email alias on the mail server as well (although that can be automated with a > bit of magic) > > Others thoughts on that would be welcome, as well as the extent to which we > may want to apply some grouping to the above? I did not think about the following, but if we want that, we need to have consistent mail aliases for all frameworks. I think special grouping makes then no sense. Greetings Christoph
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
