I'm ok with lgpl. On Mar 3, 2014 4:29 PM, "šumski" <hrvoje.sen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Monday 03 of March 2014 16:20:20 George Staikos wrote: > > What license are you asking for? Sorry I haven't read the back info and > > don't feel like digging. :) > > > > Quote: > "kwallet-framework-4.96.0/src/runtime/kwalletd/kbetterthankdialog.(cpp|h) > and > kwallet-framework-4.96.0/src/runtime/kwalletd/kwalletwizard.(.cpp|.h) are > both > GPL-2.0+ licensed. Can you check with upstream if this is known/intended. > If > intended, the license should be LGPL-2.1+ and GPL-2.0+ (unless the GPL-2.0+ > files are linked with the LGPL-2.1+ files so as that a resulting derived > work is > created - which should be GPL-2.0+ licensed)." > > Question is now, can those files be relicensed to LGPL-2.1+ ? > > > Cheers, > Hrvoje
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel