On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Kevin Ottens <er...@kde.org> wrote: > On Wednesday 02 April 2014 18:48:24 Aleix Pol wrote: > > Hi, > > I know I'm changing what I say about drkonqi every now and then, but > every > > step I take, I realize that the project is bigger and bigger. What I > wanted > > to do originally was to move it to KCrash, KCrash without drkonqi is much > > less useful. > > > > Today I stripped out KDE4Support from it and realized the amount of > > dependencies is quite considerable: > > - without bugzilla integration: > > KF5::I18n > > Can be stripped using tr()? > > > KF5::IconThemes > > Huh? I wonder what it's using there... I'd be surprised if it needs > something > fancier than QIcon::fromTheme(). > > > KF5::WindowSystem > > That's only for KStartupInfo right? > > > KF5::Crash > > To be expected. :-) > > > - with bugzilla integration (additionally to the previous ones): > > KF5::XmlRpcClient KF5::Wallet KF5::WebKit KF5::ConfigWidgets > > KF5::WidgetsAddons KF5::JobWidgets KF5::Completion KF5::Wallet Qt5::DBus > > Woaaaah! > > > Because of that fact, I considered turning the bugzilla integration into > a > > plugin, but then it's very tied to the rest of the code in drkonqi, so it > > would mean quite some work splitting it and making sense out of the > > abstraction. > > > > Does anybody want to give a hand so I can concentrate on the rest of > > kde-runtime? > > Otherwise, we can also put it in a separate repository, or we can move > > KCrash to tier 3. > > Or we keep drkonqi out and have it provided by the workspace. If not > available > then kcrash could provide a default very basic one. Sounds like something > for > 5.1 though. > > Regards. > -- > Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net > > KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list > Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel > > I confirm that KIconThemes wasn't needed, I guess I dropped the dependency while porting, on the other hand I just realized that I was wrong at the non-bugzilla dependencies, this is the correct list: KF5::I18n KF5::WindowSystem KF5::CoreAddons KF5::Service KF5::ConfigWidgets KF5::JobWidgets KF5::KIOCore KF5::Crash
And yes, we can try to trim it down, but I'm unsure how useful that would be. So I agree that we can not move it to KCrash and consider it a task for 5.0+. Aleix
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel