On Tuesday 08 April 2014 14:31:51 Alex Merry wrote: > On 08/04/14 14:02, Àlex Fiestas wrote: > > I personally do not want to have those not of interest or unmaintained > > kiosalves around, I do not want to maintain them, I do not want distros to > > ship them by default (which will happen for those distros that will > > pacakge > > the entire repository) etc. > > > > Maybe we can move them to unmaintain (there is such place in our git repos > > I think) or something like that, but I really think that kio_cgi does > > not belong near smb. > > Well, I would say: discard them or include them. I know Albert was > pushing not to get rid of code that still technically works, but I think > you either have to go that route and put it in > kioslaves/kio-extras/whatever (so that it will hopefully *keep* > working), or declare it dead on the basis no-one cares enough to bother > maintaining it. > > To a large extent, I would consider this the decision of whoever > volunteers to maintain kio-extras (or whatever it gets called).
At least that makes more sense than spawning repositories like rabbits. Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel