On Thursday 10 April 2014 10:40:04 Àlex Fiestas wrote: > On Wednesday 09 April 2014 11:57:37 Marco Martin wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 April 2014, Àlex Fiestas wrote: > > > I'm against having anything in plasma-* without maintainer and even less > > > if > > > it is something that is known to have bugs (many) in KDE4. > > > > > > So we wither split it and hope somebody will give love to it or remove > > > it. > > > > Not talking about that repo in particular, but... > > on the other hand, putting stuff in own micro repositories is as swiping > > under the carpet as leaving them in one of the main ones, if anything it > > ensures even more that it will go abandoned and unnoticed. > > If it's stuff that really nobody is even using and is safe to drop, that's > > ok (would be even ok to just delete it tough) > > > > but if is something that the user needs anyways and potentially causes > > regressions in the experience, it has to stay, and in the place that goes > > the least unnoticed. > > Developers being confortable with it, or even (gasp!) being actively > > maintained goes completely secondary behind the causing as less > > regressions > > as possible for the users. > > I guess you can leave the code there and just not add it to cmake,
Huh? I hope you realize that's the same than putting it in a micro-repository no one builds... I think that Marco meant stay in the least unnoticed place *and* built by default (seemed obvious to me, although it was implicit). Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel