On Sunday 27 April 2014 15:55:07 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Interesting fact here that original the mail was just sent to k-f-d and > k-c-d.
That was my suggestion, to avoid cross-posting to 4 lists everytime someone answers, which always creates issues because kde-packager@ is moderated. > I am seeing similar patterns in the plasma land, where they went their own > way with the releasing discussion and only sent to this list after the > discussion happened (or that's my impression) (Note i'm not complaining of > being left aside since actually i was there in person for the KF5 > dicussion). Then please don't confuse issues in the plasma world with issues in the KF5 world. I feel like you're blaming me for plasma issues.... > I'm just raising the question if we want to: > a) Try to make the KF5 and plasma people work more in the release-team list > when discussing about releases > b) Rename the release-team list to kde-applications-release-team or > something like that to make it clear it is about "KDE Applications" side of > the previous three "Applications, Plaform and Workspaces" sides of a > release > c) Disband the relase-team altogether. I am the release team (with input from Kévin and you) when it comes to KF5 releases, and I was part of the discussion, so I think your claim that release-team was not involved in the discussion just doesn't apply to the KF5 release cycle discussion. Please don't bring me/us into your complaints towards plasma. -- David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr Working on KDE Frameworks 5 _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel