Hello, On Tuesday 26 August 2014 18:25:01 Daniel Vratil wrote: > I definitely want to have the Server and the client libraries in one repo, > shipped as a complete solution for PIM storage with the server being just > part of the solution, not a standalone one.
Excellent. Definitely what I'd like to see happen. > My original idea was that we would just merge the client libs into the > existing akonadi.git repo, but setting up new akonadi-framework.git works > just fine with me (and akonadi.git end up like kdelibs.git) If we could keep the akonadi repository that would be nice. I'm not too fond of the "-framework" suffix in the repository name. > About the type-specific (-abc, -calendar, ...) frameworks: maybe there could > be something like Akonadi Framework Extras, and Akonadi Framework would > really only be the server and the base client libs? What do you think? Makes sense. An akonadi-extras is a possibility. Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel