> On Sept. 14, 2014, 3:27 p.m., Frank Reininghaus wrote: > > src/core/kfileitem.h, line 262 > > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119607/diff/2/?file=301216#file301216line262> > > > > Since we probably do not want to make it possible that all users of > > this class can make items "hidden", I'm not sure if this should be part of > > KFileItem's public API. > > David Faure wrote: > I don't have an issue with that. Gives more possibilities to the app (or > file dialog) etc. > > Bruno Nova wrote: > So, should this be left public or not? > > Bruno Nova wrote: > I still need an answer here. :-) > > Besides this issue, there is another thing that was suggested that was > not implemented: unit tests. > I'll try to do this tomorrow, but I'll probably not be capable of doing > it. > > Frank Reininghaus wrote: > To be honest, I just don't see a valid use case for that - why would an > app or the file dialog want to make the dir lister consider a particular file > item hidden? If the app/file dialog wants to hide items from the user, there > are other (and easier) ways to do that, since they already use a > QSortFilterProxyModel or some other kind of filtering mechanism, right? > > If anyone sees a good use case, then fair enough, but unless that is the > case, I don't think that one should make it public API (which is extremely > hard to change or remove in future versions!). > > Bruno Nova wrote: > That's fine by me. And those other ways you mention are probably more > reliable. > David, what say you?
If you use e.g. KDirOperator or KFileWidget you can't inject a QSFPM. But OK, better add features once we have a use case, to ensure the API matches the use case. - David ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119607/#review66475 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Dec. 4, 2014, 9:55 p.m., Bruno Nova wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119607/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Dec. 4, 2014, 9:55 p.m.) > > > Review request for KDE Frameworks and David Faure. > > > Bugs: 64740 and 246260 > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64740 > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=246260 > > > Repository: kio > > > Description > ------- > > This adds support for *.hidden* files to KDE. > > When listing a directory, the files/folders listed in the *.hidden* file will > be hidden, unless the user has chosen to show hidden files. > > This patch was initially based on the patch provided by Mark in Bug #246260. > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/core/kcoredirlister.cpp a31d629 > src/core/kcoredirlister_p.h dce7dbc > src/core/kfileitem.h bebc241 > src/core/kfileitem.cpp 74dc069 > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119607/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Built and tested the patch in Project Neon. > Dolphin was still using KDE4/Qt4 version of the library, so I only tested > using the desktop folder widget, and "folder desktop". > It worked correctly when I pointed it to "~" and "~/Desktop" (I added > ".hidden" there). > However, it didn't work when I pointed it to the "Desktop folder" (the > default option, not the custom location "~/Desktop"). > More testing is required. > > The version for KDE4/Qt4 submitted to Bug #246260 was tested in Kubuntu > 14.04, and it worked everywhere I tested (Dolphin, open/save dialogs, folder > widget and detailed/tree view in Dolphin). > It wasn't an intensive test, though. > > > Thanks, > > Bruno Nova > >
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
