> My opinion is still the same on this matter: VS2012 (aka MSVC11). I guessed as much. Just wanted to get the ball rolling again so that we can reach a decision, instead of just talking about it.
I also think that (while insufficient for the most fun things of c++11) MSVC11 (VS12) is the currently sanest choice (for frameworks). If the ball stops again, I'll consider this a decision well made. :) Cheers, Ivan On 29 January 2015 at 15:52, Ivan Čukić <ivan.cu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> My opinion is still the same on this matter: VS2012 (aka MSVC11). > > I guessed as much. Just wanted to get the ball rolling again so that > we can reach a decision, instead of just talking about it. > > I also think that (while insufficient for the most fun things of > c++11) MSVC11 (VS12) is the currently sanest choice. > > Cheers, > Ivan > >> >> Regards. >> -- >> Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net >> >> KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list >> Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel >> > > > > -- > KDE, ivan.cu...@kde.org, http://ivan.fomentgroup.org/ > gpg key id: 850B6F76 -- Cheerio, Ivan -- While you were hanging yourself on someone else's words Dying to believe in what you heard I was staring straight into the shining sun _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
