El Tuesday 10 November 2015, a les 19:57:50, Ben Cooksley va escriure: > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 8:30 PM, David Faure <fa...@kde.org> wrote: > > On Monday 09 November 2015 19:36:09 Ben Cooksley wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org> wrote: > >> > El Saturday 07 November 2015, a les 10:36:18, David Faure va escriure: > >> >> On Saturday 07 November 2015 11:17:31 Ben Cooksley wrote: > >> >> > Hi all, > >> >> > > >> >> > It appears the test running with the binary name of "threadtest" in > >> >> > kio has a grave bug which can lead to it entering into an infinite > >> >> > loop. > >> >> > > >> >> > This was consuming virtually the entire resources of one builder > >> >> > with > >> >> > old hung processes, and the whole core of another builder - > >> >> > drastically limiting the capabilities of the CI system (even though > >> >> > KIO was not being built at the time). > >> >> > > >> >> > Can someone please investigate? Manual intervention (with kill -9) > >> >> > is > >> >> > needed to remove these hung processes. > >> >> > >> >> It of course works fine on my own machine. > >> >> > >> >> And I just tried running it on LinuxNode2, in > >> >> ~/builds/kio/stable-kf5-qt5/build/autotests (after sourcing ~/kio.env > >> >> which > >> >> I just generated), and it ran fine (multiple times). > >> >> > >> >> Any suggestion on how / where to hit the issue? > >> > > >> > I too have serious problems being able to reproduce the same results on > >> > the > >> > build nodes than CI has :( > >> > > >> > I guess we're most probably missing some step (e.g. kdelibs failing > >> > test > >> > always work when i try to reproduce it, rocs compiles fine, etc) > >> > >> Albert, did you try with the kf5-qt5 or stable-kf5-qt5 branch group? > >> It seems this is a Qt regression (and the version differs). > > > > Now I'm not sure if you guys are talking about kio's threadtest or about > > other things (kdelibs, rocs). > > > > To get back to the kio threadtest topic, it passes in a loop here, even > > with Qt 5.6.> > > -> sorry Oswald, false alert. > > > > So I think Nicolás Alvarez is right, this is more likely a bug in asan. > > I forgot that we had that enabled in the CI - which makes one more > > difference between our local setups and the CI ;) > > > > Ben, Albert, do we have a way to turn off asan for kio's threadtest? > > Only for all of KIO, which I have now done. > Please file a bug against ASAN support (compiler bug I assume?)
Given how "old" is the compiler we use I am not convinced it makes sense unless we have a small testcase to attach to the bug. Cheers, Albert > > Regards, > Ben > > > -- > > David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr > > Working on KDE Frameworks 5 > > _______________________________________________ > Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list > Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
