> On Nov. 7, 2015, 9:25 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > BTW why create a KTar on top of a KCompressionDevice? KTar is able to 
> > handle compression automatically all by itself... and that's exactly the 
> > case where it will use a tempfile for the uncompressed data, making seeking 
> > work. This patch is unnecessary if you use KTar the intended way: if the 
> > filename doesn't end with .gz or .bz2, specify the mimetype explicitly in 
> > the KTar constructor.

KCompressionDevice is supposed to be used when you want to extract data from a 
QIODevice directly instead of a file -- KTar only handles compression 
automatically if you pass it a filename. ATM, KCompressionDevice doesn't seem 
to work properly with many QIODevices -- not even with QBuffer.


- Romário


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125974/#review88126
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 6, 2015, 2:52 a.m., Romário Rios wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125974/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 6, 2015, 2:52 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks and Aleix Pol Gonzalez.
> 
> 
> Repository: karchive
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Up until now, since at least 5.12, decompressing some data coming directly 
> from a QIODevice by using KCompressionDevice because this is a sequential 
> device, and KTar and KArchive used to use QIODevice::seek and pos and some 
> places, which made the decompression fail. This patch makes KTar 
> sequential-friendly by replacing the calls to seek and pos with read and a 
> simple counter, respectively.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/karchive.cpp 0ece37c 
>   src/ktar.cpp 824395e 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125974/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Makes the tests from review #125941 pass
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Romário Rios
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Reply via email to