> On Feb. 10, 2016, 4:19 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > Are we convinced that KIdleTime is the best place to put this?
> > 
> > KIdleTime definition is:
> > > KIdleTime is a singleton reporting information on idle time. It is useful 
> > > not only for finding out about the current idle time of the PC, but also 
> > > for getting notified upon idle time events, such as custom timeouts, or 
> > > user activity.
> > 
> > Which I'm not sure is the same.
> > 
> > Furthermore, KIdleTime is supposed to be crossplatform.

> KIdleTime definition is:

Nowhere it says that the definition cannot be updated though. Disabling what 
happens when user is idle is directly related to "idle time detection".


- Martin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126650/#review92227
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 26, 2016, 7:13 p.m., Martin Klapetek wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126650/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 26, 2016, 7:13 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks and Kai Uwe Broulik.
> 
> 
> Repository: kidletime
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This is a work-in-progress, but I'm putting it up for a feedback now
> as most people are gone for the day when I wake up :)
> 
> ---
> 
> After some discussion in https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126627/
> and then with Kai Uwe Broulik, I've added a PM/ScreenSaver inhibition
> capabilities to KIdleItem.
> 
> We decided with Kai that we want simple stuff, encapsulated away for
> the client as much as possible. So the Inhibition class has a static
> "constructors" which make the usage as easy as follows:
> 
> KIdleTime::Inhibition::createInhibition(KIdleTime::Inhibition::InhibitScreen, 
> QStringLiteral("Playing Movie"), mainWindow);
> 
> That call would return an Inhibition* object which has methods to set
> the inhibition type and reason and to activate/deactivate the inhibition.
> The static method above would activate() on the Inhibition right away;
> this allows a simple fire-and-forget usage. The Inhibition object can
> be parented to any other object; the inhibition will be deactivated when
> the Inhibition object is destroyed. The user can also keep the pointer
> around and call deactivate() whenever actually needed.
> 
> The inhibition itself first looks for Solid and if present, it uses the
> Solid interface. If not present, it goes for the FDO interfaces.
> 
> It comes with an autotest.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   CMakeLists.txt ed5dc0c 
>   autotests/CMakeLists.txt PRE-CREATION 
>   autotests/fakePMServer.h PRE-CREATION 
>   autotests/fakePMServer.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   autotests/inhibition_test.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   autotests/qtest_dbus.h PRE-CREATION 
>   src/CMakeLists.txt 23e5e29 
>   src/inhibition.h PRE-CREATION 
>   src/inhibition.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126650/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Everything works as expected, plus there's an autotest.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Martin Klapetek
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Reply via email to