> On May 3, 2016, 2:30 p.m., Jan Grulich wrote:
> > That doesn't make much sense to me, if you are getting that error then it 
> > means either LastSeen property was introduced in older NM version or it was 
> > backported in your distribution. I'll check that and update that 
> > NM_CHECK_VERSION accordingly.
> 
> Jan Grulich wrote:
>     LastSeen property was indeed introduced in NM 1.0.6 so you shouldn't get 
> any "unhandled property LastSeen" with older NM versions. If nm-qt was build 
> previously against older NM version and then NM got updated then you need to 
> rebuild it of course.

this isn't my bug really. this is about bug 362611.  I was just trying to help. 
 I can discard this and can you respond to bug 362611?


- Allen


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127825/#review95140
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 3, 2016, 2:04 p.m., Allen Winter wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127825/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 3, 2016, 2:04 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks and Jan Grulich.
> 
> 
> Bugs: 362611
>     http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362611
> 
> 
> Repository: networkmanager-qt
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> If compiling against NetworkManager v1.0.5 or lower you'll get zillions of 
> debug messages about "unhandled property LastSeen".
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/accesspoint.cpp 62cbc6c 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127825/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> none. it compiles.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Allen Winter
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Reply via email to