Ben Cooksley ha scritto: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:36 PM, René J.V. Bertin <rjvber...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Sunday January 29 2017 08:32:21 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> >> Hi, > > Hi Rene, > >> >> >From this point forward, communities should be moving away from >>> Reviewboard to Phabricator for conducting code review. Sysadmin will >>> be announcing a timeline for the shutdown of Reviewboard in the near >>> future. >> >> I hope that shutdown doesn't mean complete disconnect; it would probably be >> a loss of as-yet unknown importance if all code reviews become unavailable. >> >> I'll miss ReviewBoard. Phabrithingy may be more powerful and versatile, but >> RB had its advantages too which could be why it's still being used (quite a >> lot, as far as I can see) and hasn't been integrated with KDE's own IDE yet. > > It will be a complete shutdown of Reviewboard - we'll be archiving it > in the event for some reason it becomes necessary to access the data > it stores.
Isn't it a way to change the site in static website and keep it alive? Checking the history of a review can tell a lot. Also for discarded reviews. > > In most cases mailing lists should have the history of reviews in > their archives, so those will continue to be accessible through list > archives in the long run. I think we should ensure to have the archives on mail.kde.org if this is the case. -- Luigi