On Wednesday March 15 2017 09:07:48 David Faure wrote: >Definitely. But there's another solution: QObject::setProperty, >which supports dynamic properties so you can store anything you want in there.
I did think of something like that, but didn't get around yet to figuring out how. Any idea how much overhead that method comes with? A priori I'd just need to store a boolean. Talking about overhead, what would be cheaper, storing the result of a dynamic_cast in a temp. variable or calling obj->inherits()? (I could peek at the sources and run benchmarks but I'm not convinced it'd be worth the time.) R.
