mwolff requested changes to this revision. mwolff added a comment. This revision now requires changes to proceed.
I'm personally all for improving the status quo, but I think the biggest problem here is that we have no unit test coverage (or do we?). The unit tests would also clearly show the advantage of this new beheavior compared to the old one. So: Could you add unit tests? REPOSITORY R39 KTextEditor REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D4234 To: cactus, #ktexteditor, mwolff Cc: mwolff, anthonyfieroni, dhaumann, brauch, cullmann, kwrite-devel, #frameworks
