jgrulich added a comment.
In https://phabricator.kde.org/D5775#110551, @apol wrote: > In https://phabricator.kde.org/D5775#110530, @jgrulich wrote: > > > In https://phabricator.kde.org/D5775#110529, @jgrulich wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > good idea, it should solve all the problems, we should use similar approach in KNotifications for SNI support. > > > > > > Actually this won't work for KNotifications and SNI, still problem with --own-name=o.k.StatusNotifierItem.appName.* which won't let you register another SNI as the previous one owns all the service names. This however should work for this as org.kde.appName.* is allowed by default. > > > Are you sure that we can't change the status notifier name to something else e.g. `org.kde.appname.StatusNotifierItem.<stuff>`? You are totally right, I didn't realize that we can change it to have name which is already allowed by flatpak. REPOSITORY R271 KDBusAddons REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D5775 To: apol, #frameworks, jgrulich Cc: dfaure, davidedmundson, aacid
