chinmoyr marked an inline comment as done.
chinmoyr added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
> fvogt wrote in sharefd_p.h:66
> If that is the case you can do something like:
>
> #if !defined(__linux__) && !defined(__FreeBSD__)
> #error No secure implementation available
> #endif
I think this is not needed. It's already there in FdReceiver.
> sharefd_p.h:47
> {
> - return sizeof addr;
> + return offsetof(struct sockaddr_un, sun_path) +
> strlen(addr.sun_path);
> }
@fvogt Is +1 for null byte required here?
REPOSITORY
R241 KIO
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D9966
To: chinmoyr, #frameworks, thiago, fvogt
Cc: ngraham, fvogt, lbeltrame, dfaure, michaelh
