sharvey added a comment.
In D11924#240057 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D11924#240057>, @graesslin wrote: > In D11924#240045 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D11924#240045>, @graesslin wrote: > > > I'm not sure whether we can add elements to the states. > > An implementation MAY add new atoms to this list. Implementations without extensions MUST ignore any unknown atoms, effectively removing them from the list. These extension atoms MUST NOT start with the prefix _NET. Thanks, Martin. That's very interesting. I'm in the process of making the changes. Does the invalid atom name mean KWin would not honor it? Or does it "just" mean it's out of compliance with a standard? REPOSITORY R278 KWindowSystem REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D11924 To: sharvey, hein, graesslin Cc: graesslin, apol, #frameworks, michaelh, ngraham
