ossi added a comment.
In D11236#393789 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D11236#393789>, @ossi wrote: > detaching via double fork() "protects" the child process, > but does *not* break the permission inheritance. ok, i take that back and claim the opposite - i misinterpreted the kernel's task_struct's real_parent member's purpose. that also means that the kernel doc is mildly misleading ("descendant" clearly refers to the current relationship after possible re-parenting, not the real ancestry at time of forking), but i suppose one is expected to know the exact definitions of the used terminology. REPOSITORY R285 KCrash REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D11236 To: croick, #frameworks, ossi Cc: dfaure, lepagevalleeemmanuel, kde-frameworks-devel, sitter, michaelh, ngraham, bruns
