On 28/12/2019 23:30, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote:
Why are you proposing to do a step back instead to the old state, which everyone including you considered not that satisfying?
Because it's a temporary situation. We still have a way forward in KF6 (which will open in a few months).
Generally, getting Grantlee into KF5 now also establishes the wrong precedent. Grantlee should be split into two repos each with a tier 1 library (KF6::TextDocument and KF6::TextTemplate). The two are independent and have nothing to do with each other aside from authorship. That seems to be something you were objecting to, so I want to make sure that's something addressed on its own. The two KF6 libraries will then follow the KF6 naming conventions etc.
I hope my personal objections raised about it becoming an official KF module already now have not arrived with you as objection in general.
Not at all. I agree that the two libraries should be consistent with the rest of the Frameworks.
On the opposite, I agree with the ideas behind this move. I have just strict feeling about KF as a product itself when it comes to consumer as well as cross-module ontributor experience. So please be aware that I would be sad if you decided to have Grantlee go back to lonely cowboy mode :)
Only temporarily :). Thanks, Stephen.
