El Lunes, 4 de Abril de 2005 01:41, Michael Nottebrock escribi�:
> On Monday, 4. April 2005 01:20, Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
> > the respective software maybe near a 20% of the ports system,
> > including main gnome/kde bits.
> >
> > None of this use desktop options like OnlyShowIn or NotShowIn. Nor
> > have his category defined closer to Annex A.
> >
> > kde .desktop entries still use X-KDE-StartupNotify instead of
> > StartupNotify.
> >
> > Also, we need a solution to the gnome pixmaps and kde icons
> > problem.
>
> No, KDE and GNOME need to find solutions to those problems. You're
> not seriously suggesting we should just go ahead and roll our own
> .desktop and .menu files, are you?
More or less , yes.
At last, .desktop files. You can see this allready done in mandrakesoft
(IMHO, better that debian on this). And I think fedora will go ahead
for the next core (core5).
Yes, this is the _huge_ task.
And the first step is get a controlled way to easy test parts of foreing
desktops to see what needs to be changed.
I know this maybe a very specific need, but it's my need.
So, I prefer something like this:
Makefile:
XDG_CONFIG_DIRS?= /etc/xdg:$LOCALBASE ...
XDG_DATA_DIRS?= %%LOCALBASE%%/share ...
script:
XDG_CONFIG_DIRS="${XDG_CONFIG_DIRS}:%%XDG_CONFIG_DIRS%%"
XDG_DATA_DIRS="${XDG_DATA_DIRS}:%%XDG_DATA_DIRS%%"
export XDG_CONFIG_DIRS XDG_DATA_DIRS
or some in this line (I'll work a patch).
allthought I can install a modified script instead of the port if this
is mainatined out of kde meta-package.
--
josemi
_______________________________________________
kde-freebsd mailing list
[email protected]
http://freebsd.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
