On Thursday, 14. April 2005 22:51, Kent Stewart wrote:
> On Thursday 14 April 2005 12:20 pm, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > On Thursday, 14. April 2005 20:13, Will Andrews wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 12:15:13AM -0700, Matt Navarre wrote:
> > > > Kpackage does this on FreeBSD 4.11 with KDE 3.4 also, did it
> > > > with KDE 3.3 come to think of it. So it's not just a 5.x thing.
> > >
> > > kpackage has always worked slightly incorrectly on FreeBSD.  I
> > > doubt anyone will fix it, especially since there's a FreeBSD
> > > specific tool called Barry.
> >
> > Which doesn't quite do what kpackage does (or at least attempts to)
> > though, for instance it cannot install or remove packages. But
> > indeed, for kpackage to become actually useful on *BSD, it would need
> > a dedicated (upstream) maintainer for the *BSD-pkg functionality
> > (IIRC the code that's currently in there was contributed by an
> > OpenBSD user).
>
> Not only that but barry can't find /usr/ports/INDEX.db on my systems. I
> have an INDEX[-5] and then some gzip'ed backup copies before it comes
> to INDEX.db and it can't find the *.db.

Might be due to http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/76935. 
Anyway, barry also fails to compile on 5.x and is, more or less, just as 
unmaintained as kpackage.

-- 
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org

Attachment: pgpkhFqL4bQWV.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
kde-freebsd mailing list
[email protected]
http://freebsd.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd

Reply via email to