On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 18:26 -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > вівторок 12 липень 2005 18:10 Ви написали: > > I've tested OpenSLP 1.2.1 with netatalk, and it seems to work fine. I > > can start slpd, and I can register my afp service with it. > > The slpd executable links with a private library which includes the > slp_net.o. > That library is not installed.
Yep, which is why no further linking is needed. > > > I've looked at the nm output for libslp.so, and sure enough, the symbol is > > not defined. > > > I'm not opposed to the first patch, but the patch for slpd is not > > needed. > > slpd would not link for me, because it needs the slp_net.o as well. Since the > first patch moved the object file into libslp, I had to make sure, slpd links > with that library too. Are you sure, slpd executable was created properly? Yes, it links, installs and runs just fine for me. > > > slpd works fine without it, and if you look at its symbol > > table, the SLPNetGetThisHostname symbol is defined. It's clear why the > > OpenSLP developers never ran into this problem, though. The > > SLPNetGetThisHostname symbol is only referenced if you're not on Linux, > > AIX, Solaris, or HP/UX. > > Yack... Do we need it on FreeBSD? Perhaps, we have the same facilities too, > which allow other OSes to get by without the function. I think the code would need to be slightly modified for BSDs. It might be better to leave things the way they are. I think the diff would end up being smaller. Joe > > -mi > -- Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list [email protected] http://freebsd.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
