On Thursday, 11. August 2005 20:14, Heino Tiedemann wrote: > Michael Nottebrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday, 11. August 2005 18:55, Heino Tiedemann wrote: > >> Michael Nottebrock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > You might want to consider using binary packages in the future. :-) > >> > > >> >From where? The Binaries are alway older than the ports. > > > > The latest packages are always in the > > packages-*-stable/packages-*-current directories on the ftp-mirrors. > > Since they're built from the same ports you use, it can take a week or > > two a port update to appear in binary form. > > Ah - thats the point, I didn't know. > > That means, after 2 weeks - more or less - i just can "pkg_add -r" the > newest?
More or less - you probably might want to 'portupgrade -P' instead, which will use packages if they are available and build from source if they aren't. Just make sure that PACKAGESITE points to the correct location (pkg_add only looks in the packages-*-stable directories if you're actually running -STABLE - on -RELEASE, you have to set the environment variable). -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
pgprlQ9Eoa5Sy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list [email protected] http://freebsd.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
