--On söndag, november 13, 2005 15.01.58 +0300 Andrey Chernov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 09:38:42AM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:Hi ports maintainers! I consider that DEBUG related knob should be integrated to WITH_DEBUG/WITHOUT_DEBUG. So I want to add DEBUG to /usr/ports/KNOBS. But following ports should be modified. How about do you think? ok: using WITH_DEBUG/WITHOUT_DEBUG ok? using *_DEBUG_* knobs. But I think that these should not be replaced to WITH_DEBUG. Semantics different. ng: using *DEBUG* knobs. I think that these should be replaced to WITH_DEBUG/WITHOUT_DEBUG.*DEBUG knob has different meaning from port to port and often not just -g adding, but turns on internal port debugging output/checks.
-g should really be honored through CFLAGS? I don't think that adding -g alone alone calls for the need for a DEBUG knob, it must be the internal port debugging checks we want by using the knob, right?
It means that it should be turned on/off separately on per port basis. I.e. WITH_<portname>_DEBUG. WITH_<portname>_* style options also allows to add them all into /etc/make.conf without creating name conflicts between the ports.
_______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list [email protected] http://freebsd.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
