Bartosz Fabianowski schrieb: >> kopete development [...] should not be the default since it belongs to >> a development branch > > That's not quite true. Once Kopete 0.12 has been released (which should > happen about ten days from now), this will become the preferred version > to use. It will be perfectly OK to make 0.12 the default and discontinue > 0.11.
Yes, I'd like that to happen. No kopete-devel port if we can at all avoid it - it will only be subject to bitrot eventually and complicate upgrade paths. > I am not sure net/kdenetwork3 needs that many dependencies > anymore but I did not touch them qca-tls and libidn are dependencies of libiris, i.e. kopete's jabber support - those should be removed from the sans-kopete kdenetwork port. openslp is a dependency of krfb, so it should in turn be removed from the new kopete port. > Let me know how do you want this handled. It would be probably best to do the same thing as we did back with kdegraphics - add the new standalone kopete as an OPTION-ized RUN_DEPENDS (default off) to kdenetwork and bump PORTREVISION. This way, people will be able to smoothly migrate to kdenetwork+kopete (or get rid of kopete if they're so inclined). The new kopete port also needs CONFLICTS defined with all kdenetwork versions that shipped it. Cheers, -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | [EMAIL PROTECTED] (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list [email protected] http://freebsd.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd
