Daniel W. Steinbrook schrieb:
> I'd be willing to tinker with this. I like taking on little, fun FreeBSD 
> projects for which others don't have time.
>   
Great!
> A couple of initial questions:
> - There are 10 protocols and 16 plugins. This would be 26 OPTIONS for kopete. 
> Would it be better to create two meta-ports, kopete-protocols and 
> kopete-plugins, which each have their own options?
>   
Perhaps, but it seems a lot of work only to avoid some scrolling in
dialog(1). Your call! :)
> - Should the PKGNAMEPREFIX be kdenetwork- for each of the individual 
> protocols/plugins, as it is currently for net-im/kopete? This would make for 
> some long package names (e.g. kdenetwork-kopete-protocols-groupwise).
>   
That's not a problem IMHO.

Cheers,
-- 
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
kde-freebsd mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd

Reply via email to