On Thursday 27 January 2011 11:47:04 Alberto Villa wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Raphael Kubo da Costa <kub...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I see. With my upstream hat on, I don't feel very comfortable with the > > patch in its current form -- do you intend to send it to the Okular > > developers? > > well, that patch is absolutely wrong for upstream imho too
I agree. The patch is a very specific workaround based on the FreeBSD ports environment and is probably not applicable to anyone else. > > Do you all think it makes sense to contact the cups-base maintainer to > > see if it's possible to add a lpr.cups or lpr-cups symlink? That way > > Okular wouldn't need to be patched at all. > > is okular searching for those binaries too? then i'm ok with this > solution. a quick search on google seems to suggest that lpr-cups is > more standard, so if we have to choose i vote for this, btu dinoex@ > might be comfortable with adding both, of course > waiting for other's opinion That is certainly a good option, it may very well benefit other ports as well. I second. Who will bring this up with dinoex@?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest information
