https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227509
Jan Beich <jbe...@freebsd.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #198188|0 |1
is obsolete| |
CC| |c...@freebsd.org,
| |ge...@freebsd.org,
| |gn...@freebsd.org,
| |jbe...@freebsd.org,
| |madpi...@freebsd.org,
| |multime...@freebsd.org,
| |x...@freebsd.org
Attachment #198417| |maintainer-approval?(x11@Fr
Flags| |eeBSD.org),
| |maintainer-approval?(gnome@
| |FreeBSD.org),
| |maintainer-approval?(madpil
| |o...@freebsd.org),
| |maintainer-approval?(cpm@fr
| |eebsd.org),
| |maintainer-approval?(gecko@
| |FreeBSD.org),
| |maintainer-approval?(multim
| |e...@freebsd.org)
--- Comment #11 from Jan Beich <jbe...@freebsd.org> ---
Created attachment 198417
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=198417&action=edit
v1
Does this look reasonable? A minor inconvenience to ensure Wayland build never
regresses. X11 runtime should be unaffacted (tested mpv/vaapi and firefox). If
something goes wrong some or all parts can be reverted. There's plenty of time
before the next /quarterly is branched.
I'm counting towards maintainer timeout. Review/comments are welcome from
anyone. No cookie licking, please.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
