https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=291449
--- Comment #5 from Tomoaki AOKI <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Robert Clausecker from comment #4) So typedef part of the commit base f0e541118c374869a8226eaa1320bb6eda248a20 need to be reverted, keeping others intact? If the type is included in language spec itself, there should be no need to typedef it. Or the whole commit to be reverted? Another option could be to typedef for older spec only, but not sure there are some actual needs exist or not. I've searched about char8_t type and found it's for assuring (part of) UTF-8 character(s) to be stored (UTF-8 is a multibytes character encoding, not wide character [wchar_t] in definition). There should be clear needs, but using language spec supporting it is the most straightforward way, thus, not sure support on older specs is needed or not. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
