On Sunday 21 March 2010 16:15:46 Nikhil Marathe wrote: > Meanwhile having a library like HUpnp will keep the core pretty small. > It provides > the Control Point and device discovery support that is the basic > requirement for now. I have been in contact with Tuomo Pettinen and he is > working hard on the library > with version 0.5 expected to be out in a few days. He is aiming for > API/ABI stability, > and I'm sure that since most of the implementation will be wrapped behind > solid, hopefully it won't make a HUGE difference.
Apart from these basic requirements, what upcoming features of HUpnp will you depend upon and how would it affect your proposal if HUpnp feature development slows down? Will _______________________________________________ Kde-hardware-devel mailing list Kde-hardware-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-hardware-devel
