> On Jan. 14, 2013, 1:22 p.m., Dario Freddi wrote: > > powerdevil/daemon/backends/upower/powerdevilupowerbackend.cpp, line 152 > > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108407/diff/1/?file=107187#file107187line152> > > > > Wow. Is it really a "no" and not a boolean from the remote interface? > > Can we submit a RFC to upstream systemd here? Or am I missing something?
Yup, it's a string with possible values "yes", "no" and "challenge" (the last being an interactive polkit based dialog) > On Jan. 14, 2013, 1:22 p.m., Dario Freddi wrote: > > powerdevil/daemon/backends/upower/login1suspendjob.cpp, lines 64-72 > > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108407/diff/1/?file=107185#file107185line64> > > > > I don't really like the blocking part here. I'd rather see the async > > call connecting to a slot emitting the result... lots of bad things might > > happen otherwise. Moreover, there's no UI thread in the daemon, so the > > WithGui wouldn't make sense anyway Umm, does it matter at all? The system is going to sleep anyway :) > On Jan. 14, 2013, 1:22 p.m., Dario Freddi wrote: > > powerdevil/daemon/backends/upower/powerdevilupowerbackend.cpp, lines 44-68 > > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108407/diff/1/?file=107187#file107187line44> > > > > Especially, once we get rid of m_login1Present, we can IMHO get rid of > > all of this with a simple "if (!serviceRegistered) activate();". If the > > service is not activable the call would simply fail. Note that this already > > happens in init(), line 83, making this whole portion of code redundant. Right, gonna fix this > On Jan. 14, 2013, 1:22 p.m., Dario Freddi wrote: > > powerdevil/daemon/backends/upower/powerdevilupowerbackend.cpp, line 120 > > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108407/diff/1/?file=107187#file107187line120> > > > > Moreover, here the interface is created regardless of its existence - > > not good imho. Yup... - Lukáš ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108407/#review25443 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Jan. 14, 2013, 1:12 p.m., Lukáš Tinkl wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108407/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 14, 2013, 1:12 p.m.) > > > Review request for Solid and Dario Freddi. > > > Description > ------- > > This patch adds support for systemd-login1 service to Powerdevil's upower > backend. The main purpose is that UPower will be soon dropping support[1] for > suspend/resume features so we have to rely on systemd. With this login1, we > are also gaining support for HybridSleep, where implemented by the system. > > One caveat: the current login1 implementation doesn't support[2] emitting the > "resume from suspend" signal > > [1] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/devkit-devel/2013-January/001339.html > [2] http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/inhibit > > > This addresses bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859227. > > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859227 > > > Diffs > ----- > > powerdevil/daemon/BackendConfig.cmake 5dbe6f6 > powerdevil/daemon/backends/upower/login1suspendjob.h PRE-CREATION > powerdevil/daemon/backends/upower/login1suspendjob.cpp PRE-CREATION > powerdevil/daemon/backends/upower/powerdevilupowerbackend.h ba942bd > powerdevil/daemon/backends/upower/powerdevilupowerbackend.cpp 97a409b > powerdevil/daemon/backends/upower/upowersuspendjob.h bbe2f45 > powerdevil/daemon/backends/upower/upowersuspendjob.cpp fa64ab0 > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108407/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Lukáš Tinkl > >
_______________________________________________ Kde-hardware-devel mailing list Kde-hardware-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-hardware-devel
