Hi, From what I know, currently there's a bug in glibc that ships with newest firmware that makes use of mobile kmail useless if you recieve signed messages.
I didn't read exactly what is the study about, but the data may be skewed. Regards, Hubert On Tuesday 04 of October 2011 15:18:17 Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > Hi, > > an old friend of mine (I worked with him on various GNU projects) is doing > "a user behaviour study to understand how to improve data availability and > thereby hide spotty cellular coverage, work around data transfer > allowances, and save energy." > > Everybody with a N900 can participate. Because it is a user behaviour > study, a lot of personally identifiable information is transmitted, so if > you are using the N900 for sensitive data this may not be for you, but > maybe even in that case you want to spread the word. > > The study is not specific to KDE Mobile, but the results could be useful if > the parts of KDE Mobile that consume bandwith (PIM data, certificates) can > be identified in the study as one group of data that can be optimized. > > http://hssl.cs.jhu.edu/~neal/woodchuck/user_behavior_study/ > > Thanks, > Marcus > _______________________________________________ > Kde-mobile-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-mobile-users
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Kde-mobile-users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-mobile-users
