On December 9, 2009 15:48:32 Lydia Pintscher wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 00:36, Oswald Buddenhagen <o...@kde.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 12:14:17AM +0100, Lydia Pintscher wrote: > >> Once all of KDE is on gitorious it will be extremely hard to maintain > >> the policy of only having these $-developer groups for merge requests > >> and nothing else. And the more of those groups we create with every > >> project that moves the bigger the incentive will be to not use > >> +kde-developers but the smaller group for commit rights. > > > > why do you bring +kde-developers in? it is *exactly* the equivalent of > > having an svn account. > > Well yes. That is exactly my point. We only want +kde-developers to > commit to "our" code and we want them to have access to all of it, not > only a part. > With a lot of those small project groups we give the opportunity to > give only a small group commit access to a certain part of our code. > So i'd like us to make two things sure: > 1) This is only a temporary solution.
+1 > 2) We want everyone in +kde-developers to have commit access to > everything and only them. yes; ossi was arguing for this too. :) just to be extra clear, we are *all* in agreement that commit rights go through the kde-developers group. it's only the method of handling merge request emails that opinions differ on. :) -- This message brought to you by eevil bananas and the number 3. www.chani3.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list Kde-scm-interest@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest