On Thursday 28 January 2010 01:56:38 Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em Quinta-feira 28. Janeiro 2010, às 06.50.23, Chani escreveu: > > > I think Thiago is on the spot that it's much safer to work on stable > > > branch and forward-port bugfixes instead. Personally - there was very > > > few of them - but it happened that I needed to reopen KDE bug marked as > > > RESOLVED/FIXED just after fix has been commited to stable branch. > > > > on back/forward-porting bugfixes... umm... is it *safe* to build and run > > a 4.x branch after using trunk? kde config files have a reputation for > > only letting you go forward, not back... > > That's orthogonal to any discussion on Git or how you make your patch land > in both branches. > > The fact is you have to test your fix.
It's harder with Plasma since it changes frequently and you have way more people working on it but with JuK I just leave my entire toolchain on trunk, and switch only JuK to the stable branch when I test, since I know the KConfig layout, cache layout, etc. hasn't changed. (Since I haven't changed it and no one else works on it :( Regards, - Michael Pyne
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list Kde-scm-interest@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest