> So sorry to come off as some kind of raving lunatic but I'm seriously not > sure where all the misunderstanding/freaking-out is coming from regarding > kdesvn- build. Is it just too old (and therefore busted)? Do I need to > hurry up and change the name before people will believe it handles git > modules? Is it because I bothered to try and document it fully? Is it > Perl? (then just use Michael Jansen's build tool) Or is this just the next > IRC client, and everyone is going to make their own "build them all" > script? >
huh. yeah, maybe I *should* try out kdesvnbuild. I've just got a bunch of scripts I wrote myself, and they work... plus they handle my git-svn repos that are inside some of my svn repos, and they log errors in a way I'm used to... and change takes effort. :) -- This message brought to you by eevil bananas and the number 3. www.chani3.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list Kde-scm-interest@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest
