On Friday 12. February 2010 13.35.27 Robert Wohlrab wrote: > Riccardo Iaconelli wrote: > > So, what are we doing now? Giving up on git and telling people to just > > screw up and use git-svn? Think more? Hire someone to make a better > > git? Or what? > > No, just implement the narrow transfer protocol and handling.
What we need is less talk and more action. I'm seeing loads of people with strong opinions talking endlessly. The problem is that they are trying to decide how *other* people should do the work. I'm feeling that we *had* a consensus about a certain repo layout. People were gearing up to do the actual rule writing. I did get the rulesets going on gitorious, the conversion tools is there too. Rules were being written, commits were being made. Is anyone still working on rulesets? I haven't seen a commit for ages to that repo, and I fear nobody will want to work on a module while there is a huge thread on how it should be done. (would you?) What we need is someone saying "I'll start". And follow the good old "he who does the work decides". And ignore the people screaming on the sidelines trying to distract us from actually moving forward. At this point I frankly don't care anymore if KDE splits modules or not. What I care about is that this effort is loosing people faster than a sieve loosing water. If we ever want to get somewhere the bikeshedding has to stop. -- Thomas Zander _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list Kde-scm-interest@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest