On Thursday 19. August 2010 17.02.59 Arno Rehn wrote: > With KDE bindings we have the problem that many people only want the Qt- > specific part of the bindings (like QtRuby or Qyoto) - and then only for > one language. Having all of the different bindings in a KDE module makes > it difficult for them to install only the Qt portion and even prevents > some people from contributing (there's already a fork of QtRuby on github, > because people don't like checking out the complete kdebindings and then > going through the hassle of figuring out how to compile only QtRuby).
Is this really *the* problem? With a total checkout size of 116Mb I'm thinking the git repo is not really that big. Maybe you can give us an exact number of the unsplitted size. Figuring out which one to compile sounds even stranger; the detection is pretty advanced and it won't even try to compile the parts you don't touch. The reason for keeping it together is because the KDE team intends to release the bindings as a 'kdebindings' for each KDE release. One git repo then equals one tarball that is released. I think Thiago gave a nice overview of the reasons behind that; which I won't repeat here as this is a discussion that should not be reopened again without really good reasons :-) As Aaron wrote some time ago; "Its a discussion we had and closed, its decided" The reasons you cite are not entirely convincing to me, at this late stage, to warrent a change in strategy. -- Thomas Zander _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list Kde-scm-interest@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest